Search Results

1. [2010] NZEmpC 12 NZ Tramways & Public Passengers Transport Employees' Union Inc v Wellington City Transport Limited [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...protection or other benefit of employees in unusual circumstances. These provisions include additional paid time for employees to complete responses to reports, complaints or enquiries where these cannot be completed during rostered duties (cl 10.1(e)); Paid travelling time where employees may be required to begin or finish work at depots other than their home depot (cl 12(a)). Clause 19 dealing with “ACCIDENTS” is instructive as to the philosophy of the collective agreement...

2. [2018] NZSSAA 41 (14 August 2018) [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...2012 at page 99 of the Ministry’s report correctly recorded the amount of her Chinese 7 pension as RMB 4280 per month. She said that this amount included a supplement of RMB 2980 for living expenses. She also accepted that page 101, which is a translation of page 102, correctly recorded the amount of XXXX’s Chinese pension as RMB 3035.90 per month, also on 5 September 2012. [31] XXXX, the appellants’ daughter, also gave evidence. She challenged the accuracy...

3. KQ & WQ v EN & MN [2021] NZDT 1439 (27 April 2021) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...be addressed before the substantive matter may be determined. The Disputes Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear claims founded on contract, but not claims regarding the recovery of an interest in land or where the title to any land is in question (ss 10(1)(a) and 11(5) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 (DTA)). 5. These proceedings concern a contract between the parties that does not relate to the recovery of an interest in land or a question as to the title to the land. Therefore, the Tr...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 145 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...granted such that the following parts of SPL's appeal are now struck out: Strategic Topic 2: Rura//andscape Strategic Objective 3.2.5.2 Strategic Policy 3.3.32 Appeal point ENV-2018-CHC-29-004. Universal Developments Limited (ENV-2018-CHC-101) [17] UDL made an original and further submission on the Proposed Plan: (a) its original submission focused on the existence of the Outstanding Natural Landscape line annotation over residential zones, the provisions of Chapter 8 M...

5. 20220928-NZBORA-Advice-Deposit-Takers-Bill.pdf [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...a. Prohibiting persons from falsely holding out that they are a licensed deposit taker;7 2 See, for example, Slaight Communications v Davidson 59 DLR (4th) 416; Wooley v Maynard 430 US 705 (1977). 3 Clauses 30, 31, 32, 40, 43, 64, 65, 99, 101, 102, 108, 116, 119(2)(b), 120(1)(b), 121, 341, 375, 377, 378, 413, 417, and 449. Clauses 80 and 85 to 88 authorise the Bank to issue prudential standards requiring the provision of information by deposit takers or particular classes of deposi...

6. Lawson v Intended Defendant (No. 2) (Extension of time to commence proceedings) [2023] NZHRRT 33 [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...circumstances. [8] If that onus is met, I then have a discretion to extend the relevant period within which Miss Lawson’s claim had to be filed with the Tribunal. 3 Which includes a Deputy Chairperson pursuant to the Human Rights Act 1993, s 101A. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2020/0031/latest/link.aspx?id=LMS23470#LMS23470 https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2020/0031/latest/link.aspx?id=LMS23456#LMS23456 3 What constitutes exceptional circumstances [9]...

7. Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 105 KB]

   SUMMARY Case: Hearn & Ors v Parklane Investments Limited & Ors – INTERIM DECISION File No: TRI 2008-101-000045/ DBH 05356 Court: WHT Adjudicator: R Pitchforth Date of Decision: 30 April 2009 Background This is an interim determination relating to a claim filed by the trustees of the A Hearn Family Trust (the Trust). The Trust sought redress from the following parties believed to be responsible for their leaky unit: First respondent: Parklane Investments Limit...

8. Finlay v Baker [pdf, 42 KB]

   WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL CLAIM NO: TRI-2009-101-000014 BETWEEN JOHN & KATHLEEN FINLAY Claimant AND GEORGE BAKER First Respondent (Removed) AND STUART SIZEMORE Second Respondent (Removed) AND LAJAK HOLDINGS LIMITED Third Respondent AND BRIAN LAMB Fourth Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 4 Dated 3 September 2009 Contents Conference......................................................................................

9. Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 39 KB]

   WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL CLAIM NO: TRI-2008-101-000045 BETWEEN ALISON MARGARET HEARN, MURRAY DEANS AND HARTHAM TRUSTEES LIMITED AS TRUSTEES OF THE A HEARN FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND PARKLANE INVESTMENTS LIMITED (NOW BOULCOTT INVESTMENTS GROUP LIMITED) First Respondent AND EMPA GROUP CONSULTANTS LIMITED Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND RAJU MORAR, NEESHA MORAR AND ISHWERAL MORAR AS TRUSTEES OF THE I & R...

10. Savage - Goulton (2013) 65 Taitokerau MB 1 (65 TTK 1) [pdf, 96 KB]

    ...aware of Rangi Goulton’s will. But in my view the more significant factor is that these interests were part of the estate of Ema Tuari, that under her will they would have gone to 2 75 Northern MB 101-102 (75 N 101-102). 65 Taitokerau MB 6 Pairaka Stewart, but that as per the family arrangement, it was decided that all of the interests that would have gone to Rangi Goulton would got to her 12 children without exclusion....