3455 items matching your search terms
...$2,308.05 (inclusive of GST) in relation to his costs application. 1 Cornish Truck & Van Ltd v Gildenhuys [2019] NZEmpC 6. 2 Gildenhuys v Cornish Truck & Van Ltd [2018] NZERA Auckland 101. [2] He also sought $4,500 for costs in the Authority, together with disbursements of $71.56, covering the filing fee (inclusive of GST). I understand the costs anyway have been paid to him by Cornish Truck. He also is entitl...
...2 Referred to as the principle of privity of litigation. See Seales v Attorney-General [2015] NZHC 828 at [43]-[48]; Ovation New Zealand Ltd v The New Zealand Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Inc [2018] NZEmpC 101 at [6]. 3 Seales at [45]. [6] To put the Attorney-General’s concerns in context, it is necessary to understand what the case is about and what contribution the proposed interveners might be in a position to make. [7] In th
...B A Corkill Judge Judgment signed at 3.00 pm on 6 August 2019 5 Allen Chambers Ltd v Pelabon, above n 1, at [20]-[22]. 6 Pelabon v Zumo Retail Nelson Ltd [2017] NZERA Wellington 101.
...However, the Supreme Court has held that an unreasonable search logically cannot be reasonably justified and therefore the inquiry does not need to be undertaken.4 3 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 4 Above, n1 at [162]. Rather, the assessment to be undertaken is first, whether what occurs is a search or seizure, and, if so, whether that search or seizure was reasonable. In asses...
...that s 178(2)(b) was satisfied, I would nevertheless have exercised my discretion against granting special leave in the particular circumstances. 4 Such issues have not, to date, manifested in the Court. 5 Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 101(ab) and 143. 6 Jackson v The Aorere College Board of Trustees NZERA Auckland 3060512, 22 June 2021 (notice of direction). [16] The application for special leave is declined. If any issue of costs arises I will receive memora...
...be made. Quantum [17] There was a significant difference between the parties as to the quantum of costs appropriate, with the Council seeking an award of some $85,000, while Merveber 9 Merveber Limited v Auckland Council [2024] NZEnvC 100, at [101] – [102]. 6 Limited said that if any cost were to be awarded this should be around $20,000. [18] The first question is of the amounts claimed. For both the planning and landscape architecture witness, Council expert witness costs am...
...www.data.govt.nz/use-data/showcase/official-statistics/ Offence 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 Cruelty/Ill-Treatment Of Animals 59 62 66 59 68 Fail To Prevent/Mitigate Suffering 5 5 10 0 5 Miscellaneous Offences Animal Welfare Act 82 69 61 66 101 Miscellaneous Surgical Procedure Offences 2 0 1 3 0 Miscellaneous Transportation Offences 5 1 0 2 5 Total 153 137 138 130 179 This data counts convicted charges with an offence under the Animal Welfare Act 1999 and the Animal Welf...
...SCL’s lack of compliance with abatement notices and other directions over a month, and history of prior enforcement action, QLDC had little choice but to seek interim orders to 2 Referred to Tasman District Council v Douglas [2010] NZEnvC 101. 3 Wellington City Council v Liffey Street Ltd [2022] NZEnvC 226. 4 Wellington City Council v Liffey Street Ltd [2023] NZEnvC 36. 5 Wellington City Council v Mackenzie EnvC W15/2001. 4 ensure compliance was prioritised at the site....
...believe that the resident or other person has any unauthorized item in their possession, they may conduct a pat down search. Any pat down search must be done in the presence of another specified person. 1 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 2 Hansen v R [2007] NZSC 7, [2007] 3 NZLR 1 (SC) per Blanchard J. 3 The Bill also makes amendments to other existing search powers in the Principal Act, but these enhance the protections and rest...
...Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 6 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 7 Section 51(1). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 9 Z, at [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 5 From the Registrar [24] The Tribunal has received from the Registrar the statement of complaint (9 April 2024), together with a paginated bundle of documents. From the complainant [25] The complainant h...