Search Results

1. Liufau v Lelatu [2014] NZIACDT 43 (31 March 2014) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...Complaint. The Adviser’s response [8] The Adviser did not file a statement of reply, but sent an email. [9] The email failed to address specifically the grounds in the statement of complaint. [10] Aside from a general denial, the Adviser: [10.1] Did not claim there was a written agreement; or [10.2] Explain why he took some 20 months to lodge an application for the Complainant. Discussion [11] The Adviser has not responded to the statement of complaint in a way that sensibly c...

2. OIA-109796.pdf [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Services Waikato - all areas of the region are serviced by the providers. Taupo 1/07/2018 - 30/06/2025 1/07/2018 - 30/06/2025 1/07/2023 - 30/06/2025 FDR contract: 1/07/2021 - 30/06/2025 Provision of child specialists in FDR contract: 1/01 /2024 - 30/06/2025 1/07/2023 - 30/06/2028 Service Description Provider(s) Regional Coverage Contract Term Community legal services - advice, Community Legal Advice Waikato - Tarangi (within th~ --aupo representation, and education Wh...

3. NZCVS 2023 Key Results (Cycle 6) [pdf, 5.9 MB]

   ...proportion of adults ^ sign indicates a significant difference between current year and base year (2018) 44 Year Estimate Offence Type 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Violent offences Count 401 403 404 409 543 449 Rate 10.1 10.0 9.8 10.2 13.1 10.5 Threats and damages Count 308 262 298 321 564 263 Rate 7.8 6.5 7.2 8.0 13.6 6.2 Interpersonal violence Count 709 666 702 729 1,108 712 Rate 17.9 16.6 17.0 18.2 26.6 16.7 A...

4. CNI Iwi Land Management Limited.pdf [pdf, 226 KB]

   TTH-102092-9-25-V2 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-0000101 AUCKLAND REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (the RMA) IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14(1) of Schedule 1 of the RMA against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan AND IN THE MATTER of section 274 of the RMA BETWEEN AUCKLAND/WAIKATO AND EASTERN FISH...

5. L Foundation v OS [2023] NZDT 554 (9 February 2023) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...filed a submission entitled “Additional Evidence and Claim”, wherein the Trust sought to add a claim for a debt allegedly owed by OS to the Trust, totalling $10,185.00. 5. The jurisdiction of the Disputes Tribunal is limited. 6. Section 10(1) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 states that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear certain types of claims, including claims for the recovery of any physical property. 7. Section 10(3) states that: For the purposes of subsection (1),...

6. Tahere v Trustees of Rangihamama X3A - Rangihamama X3A and Omapere Taraire E (2015) 118 Taitokerau MB 194 (118 TTK 194) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...the special powers of the Chief Judge per s 44 of the Act. Section 44 provides that where an order is erroneous in fact or 16 Taueki – Horowhenua block 11 (Lake Horowhenua) (2012) 279 Aotea MB 101 (279 AOT 101). 17 Nicholls v Nicholls – W T Nicholls Whānau Trust (2013) 55 Waikato Maniapoto MB 288 (55 WMN 288), Nicholls v Nicholls – Part Papaaroha 6B [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 515 (2013 APPEAL 515), Trustees of the Ma...

7. [2023] NZEmpC 38 Halse v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...His claim is that there was a mistake in law arising from the Authority not filing a statement of defence to his claim and participating in the proceeding where he sought to review its decisions. He derived that view from reading together ss 10(1) and 14 of the Judicial Review Procedure Act 2016. An allied submission was that under s 27 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 he had “a fundamental right to have the Authority turn up in Court and defend its decision”. [...

8. Wall v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd (Delay) [2017] NZHRRT 8 [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...applications are also determined by the Chair (s 95). All decisions of the Tribunal are written by the Chairperson. 3 [7] The Chairperson is presently the only member of the Tribunal. The Panel maintained by the Minister of Justice under s 101 is a separate statutory entity which is drawn on by both the Chairperson and by the High Court. Members of the Panel are only ever members of a “tribunal” when appointed by the Chairperson for the purposes of a particular hearing (s 98...

9. NZBORA Advice Fuel Industry Amendment Bill [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...Bill’s objective. 1 The Supreme Court has held that an unreasonable search logically cannot be demonstrably justified under section 5 of the Bill of Rights Act and therefore the inquiry does not need to be undertaken (see Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [162] per Blanchard J). Rather, s 21 is self-limiting in that the assessment to be undertaken is whether the search power is reasonable. 2 Hansen v R [2007] NZSC 7, [2007] 3 NZLR 1. 14. The strict liability offe...

10. 2020-12-23 Willowridge MOC [pdf, 144 KB]

    ...274(1)(d). [3] At paragraph [5] of the Court minute it states: As the first instance decision-maker, the Environment Court is empowered to give a decision on the provisions and the matters raised in submissions (s 149U(6) and Schedule 1, cl 10(1)) The decisions must include the reasons for accepting or rejecting the submissions. Willowridge, however, is not a submitter. Does it not follow that there is no decision for the court to make? [4] It is understood this to mean, becaus...