Search Results

Search results for 101.

4485 items matching your search terms

  1. YM v EB LCRO 287/2014 (31 March 2015) [pdf, 33 KB]

    ...application for review by Friday 5 December 2014. Ms YM cannot extend the 30 working day timeframe by not reading the email or opening her post. 2 Lawyers and Conveyancers Amendment Bill 2010 (120-1), cl 10.1. 4 [16] She does not contend that she was unable to retrieve her emails when overseas, rather she states that she had difficulty on occasions accessing a WIFI connection. Nor does she attend promptly to opening her mail on...

  2. Financial Markets Infrastructure Bill Advice [pdf, 120 KB]

    ...Bill. This is an important objective, and the search powers are rationally connected to it. 1 RJR MacDonald v Attorney-General of Canada (1995) 127 DLR (4th) 1. 2 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 15. We also consider that the powers are proportionate to the objective. An investigator can only enter and search a place, vehicle, or thing if the occupier or person in charge conse...

  3. OIA-110203.pdf [pdf, 816 KB]

    ...achieve. Be transparent about lobbying activities, donations, and confliets of interest 10. It is good practice to publicly disclose your lobbying activities (for example on a website), as this builds public trust in how you operate This may include: 10.1. Submissions to government processes, or public officials interacted with. 10.2. Any political donations or gifts given 10.3. Any government contracts held. 10.4. Membership of special interest, advocacy or industry groups. 10.5...

  4. Holland & Ors as Trustees of the Harbourview Trust v Auckland City Council [pdf, 69 KB]

    SUMMARY Case: Holland & Ors as Trustees of the Harbourview Trust v Auckland City Council File No: TRI 2009-100-000008/ DBH 05631 Court: WHT Adjudicator: Chair of the Tribunal – PA McConnell Date of Decision: 17 December 2009 Background The claimants as trustees of the Harbourview Trust purchased the house which was later found to be leaky and so the claimants filed a claim with the WHRS. This decision relates to the claims against the first respondent Auckland City

  5. Anderson v Bryant (Referral back to Human Rights Commission) [2016] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 43 KB]

    ...[10] Addressing next s 92D(1)(b)(i), the Tribunal has no reason to doubt that, if given the opportunity, both Mr Bryant and AUT University will engage with Ms Anderson and the Commission on a good faith basis and that, as submitted, mediation: [10.1] May well contribute constructively to resolving the complaint; and [10.2] Will assist the parties to better understand each other’s respective positions and thereby assist with resolving the matter. Conclusions [11] We accordingly con...

  6. MLC June 2014 Māori land update [pdf, 572 KB]

    ...272,635.6759 (89%) 33,269.4528 (11%) Tairāwhiti 1,314 1,790 3,553 217,667.2594 (81%) 50,853.4171 (19%) Tākitimu 509 667 691 70,052.6643 (80%) 17,862.2213 (20%) Aotea 1,235 2,098 1,996 352,079.8031 (78%) 101,164.8319 (22%) Te Waipounamu 586 1,399 959 42,570.3825 (64%) 23,970.8478 (36%) Total 8,246 11,482 15,898 1,139,248.6618 (78%) 315,061.2109 (22%) Other Statistics Blocks without trusts have an average size of 20ha and aver...

  7. Bisschoff v Yerman [2016] NZIACDT 44 (30 August 2016) [pdf, 127 KB]

    ...Rutherford, McMahon Butterworth Thompson, lawyers, Auckland. Date Issued: 30 August 2016 2 DECISION The complaint [1] The Tribunal upheld this complaint in a decision dated 11 December 2015, Bisschoff v Yerman [2015] NZIACDT 101 (www.justice.govt.nz). The Tribunal found: [1.1] Ms Yerman breached Clause 2.1(b) of the 2010 Code, as she failed to conduct her practice in accordance with the Act, by allowing an unlicensed person to provide immigration advice. She...

  8. Maritime Transport (MARPOL Annex VI) Amendment Bill [pdf, 135 KB]

    ...provisions of Annex VI, MTA and rules and regulations made under the MTA.6 Individuals and organisations that operate within such a regulated industry can expect to be subject to scrutiny to ensure compliance with the law. 3 Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [162]. 4 At [172]. 5 No such duly authorised person shall enter a dwellinghouse, a marae, or a building associated with a marae, except with the consent of an occupier, or with a warrant issued under s 454 of the M...

  9. People found unfit to stand trial or not guilty by insanity December 2017 [xlsx, 82 KB]

    ...offences 5 2 0 8 4 5 7 3 3 5 14: Traffic and vehicle regulatory offences 0 1 0 2 0 1 3 1 2 0 15: Offences against justice procedures, government security and government operations 1 1 1 2 2 5 3 1 4 7 16: Miscellaneous offences 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 68 57 59 102 94 101 108 125 146 193 3.Unfit-age gender ethnicity Table 3a: Number of people found unfit to stand trial, by age group, 2008 - 2017 This data counts a person once per calendar year. Age is the person's age at the offen...

  10. Practice Note: Hague Convention cases - mediation process [pdf, 32 KB]

    ...mediation guidelines setting out what is expected of mediators. 9 RIGHTS OF ACCESS 9.1 The foregoing provisions in these Guidelines shall apply to applications to enforce rights of access, with the necessary modifications. 10 DEFINITION 10.1 The term “parent” includes: (a) any person who is an applicant for the return of a child; (b) any person claiming to have rights of access in respect of a child; (c) any person who opposes the return of a child; and (d) any pe...