[2023] NZEnvC 223 MacFarlane Investments Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 490 KB]
...design of option 1 identified by Beca. In part, that was due to the length of the setback, although in Mr Carr’s observation the setback was little different to others that already accommodate high traffic volumes and larger 27 vehicles. [101] Mr Carr disagreed with Beca’s conclusion that the length of the setback in the design of that option would affect intersection efficiency. Option 1 involved no requirement for the objector’s land. Options 1 and 2 each provided f...