Search Results

1. 20231124-Justice-BIM_Redacted-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...Succession Act 2013 Treaty of Waitangi (State Enterprises) Act 1988 Occupational regulation Hotel Association of New Zealand Act 1969 New Zealand Council of Law Reporting Act 1938 Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 201017 Prostitution Reform Act 2003 14 Administered jointly with the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and Land Information New Zealand. 15 Administered jointly with the Ministry for Culture and Heritage and Te Puni Kōk...

2. LCRO 58/2017 EB v AD and BD [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...letters to this Office dated 8 April and 2 May 2014. [100] In general terms Mr EB relies upon the responses that he provided to the Committee in answering the Ds’ complaint, as well as the Committee’s reasoning in its decision. 20 [101] In relation to the complaint that he did not obtain full copies of Mrs FD’s files from her former lawyers, Mr EB said that he obtained those files promptly — that is, within six weeks of her death on [date]. The executors were not s...

3. Mairs v The Real Estates Agents Authority (CAC 413) NZREADT 9 [pdf, 819 KB]

   ...sell the property. Right from that point, he would have known he had no right to be there and the fact that he stayed there and did not immediately report the situation was a serious breach of obligation on his part. Disgraceful conduct [101] In our judgement, a reasonable agent of good standing or a reasonable member of the public would agree that the conduct of the agent in this case was disgraceful. Conduct of this kind is erosive of public confidence in real estate agents....

4. Legal Aid Payments to Firms 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 [pdf, 577 KB]

   ...27,490.98 E J Bruen Auckland 90,790.00 E R Brown Takanini 111,195.01 E S W Law Ltd Auckland 174,353.37 E.A. Law Christchurch 35,210.00 Eagles Eagles & Redpath Invercargill 564,503.83 Eastbay Law Limited Whakatane 126,973.10 Eastside Law Hamilton 101,076.70 Ebborn Law Limited Christchurch 879,790.98 Echo Haronga - Barrister Auckland 65,677.00 Edmonds Marshall Matamata 32,583.37 Edward John Werry - Barrister Auckland 4,393.20 Eilidh Hook - Barrister Hamilton 71,574.00 Elaine Ward...

5. Darby Trust v Auckland Council & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 1 [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...separate from his role as the director of Venus Investments Limited. [100] I have already referred to the classic statement of the situation when personal liability will arise given by Hardie Boys J in Morton v Douglas Homes Limited.13 [101] Keeping those considerations in mind, I now turn to outline the reasons why I consider Mr Allen to have undertaken a central controlling role in the construction of this dwelling. [102] Mr Allen has alleged that Mr French was th...

6. Langhorne v ACC [2010] NZACA 4 [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...injury by accident, means the period commencing on the 7th day after the date of the accident and ending with the 28th day of the period, or with the person’s sooner complete recovery from incapacity due to the accident, or with his death”. [101] Section 104(2) set out the factors relevant to the calculation of an earner who was an employee at the date of accident. The Corporation had a wide discretion to calculate a claimant’s relevant earnings. The subs.(2) considerations w...

7. Johnston v Abide Homes Limited [pdf, 140 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2008-100-000101 BETWEEN BRUCE McGREGOR JOHNSTON and HEATHER LILLIAN JOHNSTON Claimants AND ABIDE HOMES LIMITED First Respondent AND ALBERT LAURENCE SANDS (Removed) Second Respondent AND GEOFFREY and PEGGY TOWNE Third Respondent AND STUART GRAHAM SIZEMORE (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND ANTHONY PAUL GRUBNER Fifth Respondent AND MURRAY SCOTT ABBOT Sixth Respondent AND ELLIS ALBERT MILLER Seventh Respon...

8. McKeogh v Attorney-General [2020] NZHRRT 39 [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...and disregards their fundamental right not to be discriminated against on the ground of being married to a particular person. They submit the issue whether they are entitled to be treated as individuals is perhaps the critical thing in this case. [101] The MSD submits that to see NZS as akin to a personal investment due in full on attaining the age of eligibility regardless of the impact of the deductions mandated by SSA, s 70 fundamentally misunderstands NZS. It is a universal scheme d...

9. Lowe and Ors as Trustees of the Vivienne Hicks Family Trust v Morrison [2011] NZWHT Auckland 27 [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...Vesey‟s reputation, it was reasonable for him to expect that it was being done in accordance with the technical requirements of Plaster Systems Limited. Responsibility for the defects caused by Mr Vesey rests with Mr Vesey and the Council. [101] Given the extent of the damage caused by defects for which he is liable (principally the defects relating to the balustrade and parapet tops), we conclude that Mr Jansen has contributed to defects that necessitate the full re-cladd...

10. Zagorski v Wilkinson Building and Construction Limited [2012] NZWHT Auckland 4 [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...role. It was reasonable for him to assume that the Hitex system was being installed in accordance with its technical requirements. Responsibility for the defects created by Hitex rests with Hitex and, to a lesser extent, Mr Holyoake. [101] Two defects are associated with Mr Wilkinson‟s work. The first of these is the wooden capping on the deck balustrade wall. Mr Wilkinson has given evidence that he consulted Mr Holyoake about the adequacy of the balustrade capping pr...