Search Results

1. MOJ0504-Making-parenting-arrangements-workbook-Tongan.pdf [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...91: Weekly plan - Name 92: Weekly plan - Name 93: Weekly plan - Name 94: Weekly plan - Name 95: Weekly plan - Name 96: Weekly plan - Name 97: Weekly plan - Name 98: Weekly plan - Name 99: Weekly plan - Name 100: Weekly plan - Name 101: Weekly plan - Name 102: Weekly plan - Name 103: Weekly plan - Name 104: Weekly plan - Name 105: Text Field 3: Text Field 4: Text Field 5: Text Field 6: Text Field 7: Text Field 8: Text Field 9: Text Field 10: Text Fie...

2. [2009] NZEmpC CC 5/09 Ramsay V Commissioner of Police [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...she went to talk to Detective Neill, the Sexual Harassment Contact Officer, on her own initiative and refuted the suggestion that she wanted to hide Inspector Gaskin’s and Sergeant Smith’s involvement in the sexual harassment complaint. [101] Inspector Gaskin said that she had rung him to tell him she wanted to proceed with a sexual harassment complaint. He then briefed Detective Neill to speak with her. Detective Neill also recorded that she met with Ms Hewitson as a resul...

3. Hutcheson v Clarkson - Mangamaire B No 2 Block (2020) 86 Takitimu MB 283 (86 TKT-283) [pdf, 379 KB]

   ...Whenua Māori Act 1993 for the numerous breaches of trust. [100] The former trustees, with their consent, are appointed advisory trustees and are directed to cooperate with the independent responsible trustee regarding access to trust records. [101] There are orders in terms of the application as set out in para [58] above to the extent that remains necessary for the completion of the trust’s accounts for the period under review. [102] Clinton Hemana is appointed sole interim respon...

4. [2014] NZEmpC 134 Booth v Big Kahuna Holdings Ltd [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...parties having agreed that the hearing of that challenge ought to be deferred until after the substantive challenge had been dealt with. Counsel are invited to confer and file a joint memorandum, if possible, in relation to the costs challenge. [101] Costs are reserved at the request of the parties. Christina Inglis Judge Judgment signed at 2 pm on 24 July 2014 17 Pursuant to cl 14 of Sch 3 to the Act....

5. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Crampton [2015] NZHRRT 35 [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...namely whether the Director has established one of the forms of actual or potential harm contemplated by s 66(1) of the Act. Section 66(1) – whether an interference with privacy established – the requirements of the third sequential step [101] Breach of an information privacy principle on its own is insufficient to enliven the Tribunal’s jurisdiction to grant a remedy. For an interference with privacy to be established a plaintiff must prove both a breach of such principle and o...

6. Carter v Tulip Holdings Ltd [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...products/services; and • Architects generally carry indemnity insurance and are better able to protect themselves than are future purchasers. The liability of Architects in NZ NZBLQ 10(3) Sep 2004; pp258- 279; Darroch & Watson. [101] Mr Shand and Mr McRae appear to be advocating that the scope of duty and liability of an architect extends to providing each and every detail necessary for the proper and complete construction of a dwelling in any set of plans and specifi...

7. NO & NTO v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 44 (01 August 2013) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...[100.3] That clause 3(d) of the Code required him to provide a refund of fees payable when his engagement ceased. [100.4] That the fees were repayable as they were not fair or reasonable. [100.5] He breached the Code by failing to refund fees. [101] The Tribunal was conscious Mr Hakaoro had not produced the relevant records, and the material before the Tribunal indicated there was no attempt to comply with the Code. 13 Unprofessional language and discussion [102]...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 71 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd [pdf, 497 KB]

   ...being advanced is that Ms Stormont failed to mitigate her losses because she was honest with prospective employers and recruitment agencies, I reject it. She took reasonable steps in the circumstances to find alternative work. [101] Ms Stewart submitted that restricting any award for lost remuneration to the statutory minimum of three months would be inappropriate in this case and that the Court ought to exercise its discretion to award significantly more. Mr Sharp...

9. LCRO 156/2016 KZ v XL on behalf of [Company A] (18 January 2019) [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...early July 2013) there were time pressures to prepare a response to the Council’s application to strike out the District Court proceedings — [Company A]’s affidavits were due to be filed and served in that Court by 15 July 2013. 21 [101] [Company A] had some concerns about its exposure in relation to the application to strike out the District Court proceedings, and after speaking to both directors of [Company A], Ms KZ said that she received instructions to try and navigat...

10. LCRO 87/2018 QZ v FZB (20 December 2019) [pdf, 231 KB]

    ...2017 invoice, and retained the trust’s documents until 7 July 2017. [100] Mr QZ says if he was entitled to charge the trust, as he did in those invoices, then FZB’s position that he could not claim that lien falls away. (b) Discussion [101] The question on this aspect of FZB’s complaint is whether Mr QZ, having received the authority to uplift on 18 April, was entitled to retain the trust’s documents until 7 July 2017, a period of just over two and a half months. [102] I...