Search Results

1. [2020] NZEnvC 104 Lindis Catchment Group Incorporated v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 3.7 MB]

   ...Lindis Ribbon Aquifer) 2008.361.V1 28 Aug .05 5 Longacre Lindis River 151 2028 Station ("Timburn (including Limited Tim Burn Race") 99062.V1 1 Oct take29 of 28 2021 1/s from take point 6) 99022.V1 1 Oct .06 5 Timburn Lindis River 101 2021 Limited 2001.807.V2 1 Oct .07 T1-T4 Lindis Lindis 96 2021 (replacing Irrigation Ribbon Tarras Race) Limited Aquifer (Bores)31 A1-A9 27932 2001.809V1 1 Oct (replacing 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3 1 32 202130 Ardgour...

2. Proactive release - Setting the strategic direction for New Zealand's Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Regime [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...Strategy; 10 invited the Minister of Justice to report back to the Cabinet Economic Development Committee by the end of 2020 on New Zealand’s response to the findings and recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force Mutual Evaluation, including: 10.1 a progress report on the first year of implementation of the Strategy; 10.2 any recommendations on further work to be undertaken to support the AML/CFT regime; 11 noted that funding for any additional future work to support the AML/C...

3. [2017] NZEmpC 39 ALA v ITE [pdf, 317 KB]

   ...and confidentiality raised by ALA. I dismiss this aspect of ALA’s claim. Disclosure to elected members of plaintiff organisation [100] To this point it has been necessary to consider disclosures to judicial and quasi-judicial bodies. [101] The third alleged breach, however, is in a different category. It relates to the disclosure to an administrative body constituted under the Local Government Act 2002 (the LG Act). [102] Moreover, the challenged disclosure is one which...

4. Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee Limited v Te Rūnanga nui o te Aupōuri - application under s 182(4) Māori Fisheries Act 2004 (2015) 102 Taitokerau MB 1 (102 TTK 1) [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...is supported by those who emphasise the underlying tribal rights and the nature of the fishing claims that eventually led to the Settlement, as well as the desirability of re-establishing strong Iwi connections with local fisheries resources. [101] He Kawai states that inshore quota will be allocated according to a coastline formula, which is: 32 the closest proxy in modern terms to the customary rights that Māori had to commercially fish. The proposed allocation of Inshore Quo...

5. [2020] NZEnvC 205 Todd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 3.3 MB]

   ...decision in Man O'War Station Limiteci56 and the discussion on those and other cases, and related principles, in Upper Clutha Environmental Soc Inc. 57 For instance, identifying values is important for understanding 55 56 57 King Salmon at (101]. Man O'War Station Limited v Auckland City Council (2017] NZCA 24 at [86]. Upper Clutha Environmental Society Inc & Ors v Queenstown Lakes District Council (2019] NZEnvC 205, at (105]-(111]. I ' - -' ~ L...

6. Gilbert v Mulligan - Part 3 Lot DP 3020 and others (Shelly Bay) (2023) 466 Aotea MB 164 (466 AOT 164) [pdf, 487 KB]

   ...Te Komiti o Runga (2019) 221 Waiariki MB 200 (221 WAR 200). 42 At [52]. 466 Aotea MB 189 237 of the Act is not subject to Part 1 or s 19 of the Act; that s 237 is qualified as subject to Part 12 of the Act, but not Part 1 or s 19.43 [101] The Māori Appellate Court considered the relevant case law, the kaupapa of the Act, the scope and purpose of s 237 and how that relates to the express jurisdiction and powers set out in ss 18 and 19 of the Act.44 The concluding remarks o...

7. Directory of Official Information 2019 J-L [pdf, 834 KB]

   ...Gang Insignia in Government Premises Act 2013 6 Administered jointly with the Parliamentary Counsel Office. 7 Administered jointly with the Ministry of Health. 8 Administered jointly with the Department of Corrections. 9 Sections 100 and 101 are administered by the Department of Internal Affairs. 7 • Property (Relationships) Act 1976 • Property Law Act 2007 • Prostitution Reform Act 2003 • Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 • Public Trus...

8. Wall v Malone [2010] NZWHT Auckland 21 [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...negligence is available only when the claim is or may be based in negligence”. As the claim in tort against Mrs Malone fails I am not required to make a determination as to any contributory negligence by the claimants. CONCLUSION [101] The claim for breach of contract against the first respondent, Mrs Malone, succeeds. The claimants have the right to compensation for the loss of their bargain, the object being to financially restore the claimants to the position whi...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 205 WXN v Auckland International Airport Ltd [pdf, 455 KB]

   ...arriving or international transiting passengers on the landside of the affected airport. ... [100] A key issue arising is whether WXN is an “excluded airport person”, and thus not a member of the group described in pt 3.1 of sch 2. [101] Reference should also be made to the exceptions provided for in the Order. [102] Clause 9 provides that a chief executive – for present purposes, the chief executive of the relevant PCBU – may authorise affected persons not vaccinated...

10. Tan v New Zealand Police [2016] NZHRRT 32 [pdf, 327 KB]

    ...under the Privacy Act would inevitably be declined. Disclosure of Ms Tan’s connection to her brother along with the brother’s offending and convictions was needed or required in the circumstances and was not merely desirable or expedient. [101] The Police have therefore established that at the time of disclosure Mr Woodley genuinely held the requisite belief on reasonable grounds non-compliance with Principle 11 was necessary in terms of Principle 11(e)(i). [102] Ms Tan submitted...