Search Results

1. LCRO 80/2021 A LN and B LN v QG (9 November 2021) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...[100] Self-evidently Ms QG cannot avail herself of any COVID-19 lockdown restrictions before 26 March 2020. By then, a little over four months had elapsed since the retainer had been terminated and Mr LN had requested Ms QG’s final invoice. [101] It appears to be the case from Ms QG’s explanations for the delay, that she was preoccupied with the SSD failure and her personal litigation issues during this four-month period. [102] Nevertheless, there is no doubt that Ms QG had unr...

2. ENV-2016-CHC-000047 Blueskin Energy Limited v Dunedin City Council - Evidence - Michael Moore [pdf, 7.5 MB]

   ...remaining indigenous vegetation. Given the rural character and significant distance from the MWM-031 31 BI-309448-3-497-V2 coast itself, I believe that the proposed wind farm will integrate acceptably with its setting. Conclusion 101. Porteous Hill is not an outstanding natural feature, nor within an outstanding natural landscape. Although its eastern slopes are within the NCCLPA in the District Plan, the ‘coastal environment’ as identified in the 2GP is appr...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 29 Hall v Dionex Pty Ltd [pdf, 330 KB]

   ...to finalise the applicable figure and make payment to him. It is these difficulties that also undermine the claim for interest in relation to the commission and the plaintiff’s claim for recovery of money due at the date of termination. [101] There was a failure to provide a copy of the purported instrument of delegation. The issue of Ms Cameron’s authority to undertake the investigative and disciplinary process was squarely raised during the course of the meeting and she...

4. Tangi v ACC [2012] NZACA 4 [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...2010, the Corporation instructed Dr Rakesh Patel, Paediatric Neurologist, to prepare a retrospective assessment and opinion as to whether the appellant required “constant personal attention from the ages of 5 and approximately 10 years old”. [101] This was defined as requiring more than “simply being under the same roof or assistance with some tasks on a daily basis. Rather, it must be shown, that due to the injury, the client requires someone at least within hearing distance 24 h...

5. Broome v Auckland Council [2017] NZWHT Auckland 1 [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...the CCCs for all work under the building consent. [100] The claim alleging the existence of the duty of care is orthodox. The law is settled that a Council owes such a duty of care when carrying out its statutory and regulatory functions.27 [101] The Trust alleges that in breach of that duty of care the Council: (a) Passed inspections of the deck membrane; (b) Passed the final inspection; (c) Failed to appreciate that the specified deck membrane had been changed from a TOM...

6. ENV-2016-AKL-000187 England Spring Street Residents v Auckland Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...lost because of the extent to which the intentions of the special character overlay will be undermined in Freeman’s Bay. 10 England & Spring Street Residents seek the following relief: Height in relation to boundary in Freemans Bay 10.1 Amend the Council’s decisions version of Rule H6.6.6 by inserting the following wording at the end of the rule, namely: In Freemans Bay (see attached map), height in relation boundary under this rule shall also be measured along the...

7. Directory of Official Information J-L [pdf, 765 KB]

   ...Insignia in Government Premises Act 2013 • Property (Relationships) Act 1976 • Property Law Act 2007 7 Administered jointly with the Ministry of Health. 8 Administered jointly with the Department of Corrections. 9 Sections 100 and 101 are administered by the Department of Internal Affairs. 7 • Prostitution Reform Act 2003 • Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 • Public Trust Act 2001 • Real Estate Agents Act 2008 • Reciprocal Enforce...

8. 2017 NZSSAA 020 (5 May 2017) [pdf, 330 KB]

   ...transferred to [OCI] was the worst piece of legal advice I have heard about for many a year. I cannot avoid saying that. I know the solicitors are not here to defend themselves, but that was naive in the extreme, in my view, to have done that. [101] There is no more significance to the situation for present purposes other than that OCI assisted the Appellant in a way that cost him nothing, did not affect anything he proposed to do, and gave him a commensurate potential advantage. Th...

9. UK v VL LCRO 142/2013 (2 September 2016) [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...services involves consideration of a series of definitions in the Act, relevantly, whether she was providing legal services, which in turn are defined as meaning “services that a person provides by carrying out legal work for any other person”. [101] On a common sense basis, Ms [VL] was not carrying out legal work for any other person. She was carrying out her functions in her role as However, as the Act also defines legal work, that interim conclusion can be checked against...

10. Referendums Proactive Release Combined Final Part 2 General Election 2020.pdf [pdf, 24 MB]

    ...with quotas put in place to ensure accurate coverage by age, gender, region and ethnicity. The data was post-weighted to ensure that final results reflect the New Zealand population as per the 2018 Census. Results 10. Awareness of the Referendums 10.1. There is moderately high unprompted awareness, with two thirds (68%) of New Zealanders aware that there will be two referendums in 2020 (with respondents not having to specify what the referendums will be on); 10.2. Just under half (49%) o...