Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 232 Bidvest New Zealand Limited v FIRST Union Inc reasons for interlocutory [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...would otherwise be the lawfulness of the strike action, 6 it may be a discretionary element in considering whether to grant interlocutory relief. [39] The BPA which applies to the parties’ current collective bargaining provides, at cls 8.5 and 10.1 as follows: 8.5 The parties will work together to identify barriers to agreement and will actively explore ways to overcome those differences. … 10.1 If the bargaining process breaks down either party may call on the assistance o...

2. OIA 98977 [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...3 1 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lapsed, withdrawn or discontinued Female 0 0 0 0 3 2 3 2 8 10 4 3 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 ::.... 7 1 4 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s47 Parenting Order Application granted Female 5,681 5,411 4,932 4 ,869 4,101 3,609 3,836 3,815 3,689 3,675 3,329 2,070 417 Male 3,310 3,190 2,942 2,827 2 172 L \ ,803 1,900 1,821 1,805 1,694 1,464 984 167 Unknown 117 115 110 102 8\ 64 70 64 72 72 72 51 11 Application still active Female 0 0 0 0 2 1 6 32 81 238...

3. [2010] NZEmpC 83 Ah Ching & 40 Ors v Westpac N Z Ltd [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...following clause: (12) Project Unity Total monetary compensation for staff moving to the new Project Unity site in the Auckland CBD will be at the following gross amounts: Level 1 Up to 10kms additional travelling distance $1,000 Level 2 10.1 – 15kms additional travelling distance $1,500 Level 3 15.1 + kms additional travelling distance $2,000 Payment will be by way of an allowance that will be paid over a total of 24 weeks upon transfer to the new site. Weekly payments...

4. Data and Statistics Bill [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...undertaken is first, whether what occurs is a search or seizure, and, if so, whether that search or seizure was reasonable. In assessing whether 5 Clauses 22(2), 24(2), and 26(e) and (f) of the Bill. 6 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 7 Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161]. 8 Cropp v Judicial Committee [2008] 3 NZLR 744 at [33]; Hamed v R [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [162]. the search power in the Bill is reason...

5. Dixon v Dixon [pdf, 75 KB]

   WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-101-000026 BETWEEN LLOYD & JOANNE DIXON Claimant AND PETER THOMAS DIXON AND DARRYL THOMAS DIXON AS TRUSTEES OF THE PETER DIXON FAMILY TRUST First Respondent AND KEY HOMES TAURANGA LIMITED Second Respondent AND NEIL PAGE Third Respondent AND MICHAEL COOK (REMOVED) Fourth Respondent AND WILLIAM NICHOLSON Fifth Respondent AND JOHN TURNER Sixth Respondent AND MALCOLM HUNT S...

6. Patu – Tōrere Section 58 (2014) 95 Waiariki MB 230 (95 WAR 230) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...MATTER OF Tōrere Section 58 Block BETWEEN NEVILLE PATU AND ROVER WAIAPU Applicants Hearing: 7 February 2002, 77 Opotiki MB 281-282 (Heard at Opotiki) 2 April 2002, 78 Opotiki MB 137-161 1 October 2002, 80 Opotiki MB 101-103 5 May 2009, 108 Opotiki MB 186-208 7 March 2013, 72 Waiariki MB 142-152 19 April 2013, 76 Waiariki MB 247-248 (Heard at Gisborne) 4 July 2013, 79 Waiariki MB 241-248 (Heard at Opotiki) 5 September 2013, 83 Waiariki MB 281-285 1...

7. Brown v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 38 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2008-101-000111 BETWEEN CHRISTOPHER & JULIE BROWN Claimants AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND GLENN RYAN MUNRO Second Respondent AND BERNARD LAWRENCE O’FAGAN Third Respondent AND PATRICIA FRANKLAND (REMOVED) Fourth Respondent AND BRENT HOBBS (REMOVED) Fifth Respondent AND JOHN LINDSAY JAMES CURTIN (REMOVED) Sixth Respondent AND PETER SLOANE (REMOVED) Seventh Respondent...

8. Wellington v Wellington - Estate of Henare Haehae Wellington (2015) 104 Taitokerau MB 156 (104 TTK 156) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...will. Rose has made it clear that she does not intend to seek any such grant. As such, s 118(3)(a) is satisfied. The question in this case is whether there is no apparent reason why the estate should be formally administered. [28] Section 101 of the Act states: 101 General law to apply subject to this Part All other enactments and rules of law relating to— (a) Applications for and grant of administration of estates of deceased persons; and (b) The administration of such...

9. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Burcher [2020] NZLCDT 18 (30 June 2020) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...suspended. Limited tolerance only is to be afforded to such conduct.”4 (emphasis ours) [11] In referring to particulars nine, six, seven and eight, His Honour referred to Mr Burcher having “clearly crossed the bright line …”.5 [12] Paragraph [101] is quoted in full because it has formed the basis for submissions from both counsel, the beginning and end of the paragraph being relied upon by Mr Hodge and the comments in the middle concerning how Mr Burcher might have avoided...

10. P Ltd v Q Ltd [2021] NZDT 1643 (8 October 2021) [pdf, 145 KB]

    ...C] that the vehicle would not receive a WOF without first obtaining a LVV, as well as his photographs, which showing a level and what seemed to be a tyre extending past the mudguards, which he said indicated non-compliance with the NZTA standard at 10-1. 14. Despite this, on balance I am not satisfied that it was established that the tyres and fit out breached the NZTA standard and were not fit for purpose. I say this for reasons which include: a. No evidence was provided from the NZ...