Search Results

1. LCRO 176/2021 BR v UE and VJ (7 December 2022) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr BR has applied for a review of the determination by [X] Standards Committee, in which the Committee determined that Mr BR had breached rule 10.1 of the Conduct and Client Care Rules1 and made a finding of unsatisfactory conduct against Mr BR by reason of that breach. [2] The Committee censured Mr BR and ordered him to apologise to Mrs UE. It also ordered him to pay a fine of...

2. People discharged without conviction December 2017 [xlsx, 293 KB]

   ...injury 1,444 1,469 1,379 1,245 1,054 889 763 784 797 868 03: Sexual assault and related offences 11 16 11 28 11 23 27 63 31 22 04: Dangerous or negligent acts endangering persons 702 763 599 468 320 258 244 230 227 272 05: Abduction, harassment and other offences against the person 118 131 126 101 108 78 85 96 113 88 06: Robbery, extortion and related offences 1 1 1 1 4 2 4 5 1 2 07: Unlawful entry with intent/burglary, break and enter 78 94 104 141 99 70 75 67 58 70 08: Theft and related...

3. HRRT Position description Chair HRRT November 2021 [docx, 26 KB]

   ...provides that for any particular case the Tribunal must comprise: 1. the Chairperson and/or a Deputy Chairperson. 1. two other persons appointed by the Chairperson for the purposes of each hearing from the Panel maintained by the Minister under HRA, s 101. Functions of Tribunal Section 94 of the HRA provides that the functions of the Tribunal shall be: 1. to consider and adjudicate upon proceedings brought pursuant to sections 92B, 92E, 95 and 97 of the Act. 1. to exercise and perform such o...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 180 Malcolm v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...Items 30 and 34 if both such items were to be allowed. I allow preparation of the written submissions, but not an additional amount for the obtaining of judgment without an appearance. Consequently, the reduced amount for consideration is $14,101. [14] Mr Bennett submitted that a family member associated with one of the original parties who was removed but who is not a current plaintiff had undertaken fundraising to support the claim. The party involved no longer resides in Ne...

5. Scott v Hardaker [pdf, 69 KB]

   CLAIM NO: TRI-2007-101-000031 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN Timothy John Scott Claimants AND Bronwyn Hardaker First Respondent AND Eliot Sinclair &Partners Limited Second Respondent AND T J Hooper Third Respondent AND Christchurch City Council Fourth Respondent ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL Dated 4 October...

6. Chapman v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 76 KB]

   SUMMARY Case: Chapman v Western Bay of Plenty District Council File No: TRI 2008-101-000100/ DBH 05327 Court: WHT Adjudicator: R Pitchforth Date of Decision: 11 November 2009 Background The claimant pursued his claim for his poorly built monolithically clad house, against: First respondent: Western Bay of Plenty District Council Second respondent: Flora Creative Ltd formerly Landmark Homes Ltd as builders Fifth respondent: Mr Clarke – director of Landmark Sixth...

7. [2016] NZSSAA 030 (20 April 2016) [pdf, 26 KB]

   [2016] NZSSAA 030 Reference No. SSA 101/15 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Mangere against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member DECISION ON THE PAPERS Introduction [1] The appellant appeals against a decision of the Chief Executive upheld by a Benefits Review...

8. Brown v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 19 KB]

   SUMMARY Case: Brown & Anor v Christchurch City Council & Ors – Procedural Order No. 4 File No: TRI 2008-101-000111/ DBH 04840 Court: WHT Adjudicator: CB Ruthe Date of Decision: 9 April 2009 Background In this Procedural Order, the Tribunal deals with the removal applications filed by the third respondent, Mr O’Fagan (developer), fourth respondent, Ms Frankland (vendor), fifth respondent, Mr Hobbs (plasterer), sixth respondent, Mr Curtin (designer), and seven...

9. BORA Māori Purposes Bill [pdf, 307 KB]

   ...section 5 inquiry is essentially two-fold: whether the provision serves an important and significant objective; and whether there is a rational and proportionate connection between the provision and the objective.[1] Minimum voting age 9. Clause 10(1) of the Bill specifies a minimum voting age for Māori Trust Board elections as it defines “adult beneficiary” as a beneficiary who is 18 years of age or over. 10. This clause therefore draws a distinction between those aged 16 or 17...

10. Position description: Human Rights Review Tribunal Deputy Chair [pdf, 114 KB]

    ...provides that for any particular case the Tribunal must comprise: (a) the Chairperson and/or a Deputy Chairperson (b) two other persons appointed by the Chairperson for the purposes of each hearing from the Panel maintained by the Minister under HRA, s 101. Functions of Tribunal Section 94 of the Act provides that the functions of the Tribunal shall be (a) to consider and adjudicate upon proceedings brought pursuant to sections 92B, 92E, and 97 of the Act (b) to exercise and perf...