Search Results

1. [2022] NZIACDT 28 - DD v Pabellon (15 November 2022) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 7 [30] There is a statement of reply (19 January 2022) from the complainant. He says it was obvious he was ineligible for the skilled migrant visa. The matter had cost him $8,775 in total, including a con...

2. Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Hong [2020] NZLCDT 12 [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...were not excessive given the complexity of the matter before the Tribunal and that Mr Hong had not advanced “some other reason” why the costs should be reduced. 11 Paragraph [97]-[101] of the submissions. 12 Paragraph [19] of the submissions. 13 [38] The costs claimed are $29,450.00. This matter generated voluminous documentation including a USB disc created by Mr Hong. We accept that Mr Collins was engaged in...

3. Complaints Assessment Committee 408 v Colin Boyer [2017] NZREADT 43 [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...appropriate penalty, if any, to impose upon Mr Boyer. Mr Boyer has voluntarily suspended his licence. He also has a licence in the name of Boyer Limited and this licence is also voluntarily suspended. [10] The principles applicable to penalty: 10.1 It is well established that penalty decisions of professional disciplinary tribunals should emphasise both the maintenance of proper professional standards and the protection of the public through specific and general deterrence. Whi...

4. [2021] NZEnvC 132 Drach v Tasman District Council [pdf, 954 KB]

   ...was set in the interim decision.2 For the court ______________________________ J J M Hassan Environment Judge 2 Decision [2021] NZEnvC 118 at [91]. Attachment 1 Resource consent RM191100 & Consent notice variation RM191101– Paul Shirley and Lynette Shirley As amended by the Environment Court’s Interim and Final Decisions in Drach v Tasman District Council [2021] NZEnvC 118 and [2021] NZEnvC 132. Page 1 of 7 Resource consent Resource consent number:...

5. 2021-11-17 ORC - Closing Legal Submissions - PC8 - primary sector hearing [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...sections 104 and 104C of the RMA. Legal submissions - Scope for the changes to Policy 7.D.7 to include duration 21 In making a decision on PC8, the Environment Court must (relevantly):5 5 RMA, s 149U(6)(a)-(b). 7 (a) apply clause 10(1) to (3) of Schedule 1 as if it were a local authority; and (b) may exercise the powers under section 293. 22 Clause 10 of Schedule 1 of the RMA provides for the making of decision on provisions and matters raised in submissions. In givi...

6. [2023] NZIACDT 27 BT v Li (2 November 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 8 at [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 6 From the Registrar [23] The Tribunal has received from the Registrar the statement of complaint (29 September 2023), with supporting documents. From the complainant [24] There are no submissions from the...

7. S v L [2017] NZIACDT 3 (4 April 2017) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...5 [10] The second aspect of the complaint alleges that the adviser potentially breached clauses 1 and 2(a) of the 2014 Code by failing to properly communicate after the request for Ministerial intervention was declined. The grounds were: [10.1] The adviser provided the applicant with a “one-line email”. He provided no further information or advice. [10.2] The adviser did make some attempt to contact the complainant by telephone but was unsuccessful, and the complainant say...

8. Tiopira - Bella Tiopira [2018] Chief Judge's MB 96 (2018 CJ 96) [pdf, 359 KB]

   ...Naki Tiopira) and the land interests of Naki Tiopira were vested in Bella Tiopira solely. 9. Further land interests of Naki Tiopira were vested in Bella Tiopira absolutely at 199 Rotorua MB 35 (22 October 1980). 2018 Chief Judge’s MB 101 10. The 2007 Application and Affidavit submitted by Naki Junior Tiopira does not record Whare Tiopira as a child of the deceased. 11. Whakapapa attached to an Application For A Search dated 8 March 1993 identified the deceas...

9. Hill v Smith - Motatau 2 Section 21B1B1 and Motatau 2 Section 21B1B2 (2015) 99 Taitokerau MB 98 (99 TTK 98) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...3 71 Taitokerau MB 17 (71 TTK 17). 4 CIV 2013-485-1561. 5 Application A20140010625. 6 282 Rotorua MB 117 (282 ROT 117). 7 Ibid. 8 98 Taitokerau MB 157 (98 TTK 157). 99 Taitokerau MB 101 Savage as he maintained that order was made in error. As such, I adjourned the second application for succession sine die to allow the s 45 application to be filed. [11] On 24 February 2015 Mr Hill filed an application as per s 45 o

10. MOJ0504-Making-a-parenting-plan-workbook-Simplified-Chinese.pdf [pdf, 3.2 MB]

    ...91: Weekly plan - Name 92: Weekly plan - Name 93: Weekly plan - Name 94: Weekly plan - Name 95: Weekly plan - Name 96: Weekly plan - Name 97: Weekly plan - Name 98: Weekly plan - Name 99: Weekly plan - Name 100: Weekly plan - Name 101: Weekly plan - Name 102: Weekly plan - Name 103: Weekly plan - Name 104: Weekly plan - Name 105: Text Field 3: Text Field 4: Text Field 5: Text Field 6: Text Field 7: Text Field 8: Text Field 9: Text Field 10: Text Fie...