Search Results

1. [2024] NZEmpC 224 Kongbang v Lotus Touch Ltd [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...– s 142X; (c) when a person involved in a breach is liable for default in payment of wages or other money due to an employee – s 142Y; (d) how a state of mind of a body corporate is established – s 142Z; and 8 Legislation Act 2019, s 10(1). (e) where conduct engaged in on behalf of a body corporate can be attributed to that body corporate – s 142ZA. [16] Sections 142W and 142Y are relevant to these proceedings. [17] The purpose of s 142Y is stated in its hea...

2. Ross v Edwards - Waikite 3A [2024] Māori Appellate Court MB 100 (2024 APPEAL 100) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...Judge M P Armstrong (Presiding) Judge A H C Warren Judge T K T A R Williams Whakataunga: Judgment date 22 May 2024 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā TE KOOTI Reserved Judgment of the Court 2024 Māori Appellate Court MB 101 Hei tīmatanga kōrero Introduction [1] On 5 April 2023, Judge Wara granted an injunction requiring Mr Ross to vacate Waikite 3A and to remove the buildings and his possessions from the land.1 [2] Mr Ross sought a rehearing of...

3. Duncan Webb "Unsatisfactory Conduct" (September 2008) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...There has always been a discretion as to whether or not to charge a practitioner with misconduct. Under the 1982 Act a charge would be laid only where it was considered that “the case is of sufficient gravity to warrant the making of a charge” (s 101(2)). That provision has not found its way into the 2006 Act. However, s 152 (in respect of Standards Committees) and s 211 uses discretionary language in stating that the committee “may” make certain determinations, including a determi...

4. All charges and convicted charges December 2021 [xlsx, 272 KB]

   ...1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 38318 54623 59127 55443 68867 68699 65675 70358 66453 62342 55803 56406 66392 63307 66101 70524 72059 68594 71141 70676 73985 72266 74451 72466 68597 70040 75797 75227 76701 78849 69875 60439 60987 54011 43853 41424 41112 44244 42986 43366 45631 40555 Other 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1...

5. [2022] NZEmpC 190 Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand v Culturesafe NZ Ltd (in liq) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...804. 8 Garthwaite v Garthwaite [1964] P 356 (CA) at 387. 9 Tehrani v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL 47, [2007] 1 AC 521. 10 At [66]. 11 Bay of Plenty District Health Board v Culturesafe New Zealand Ltd [2019] NZERA 101 (Member Tetitaha). [27] Various procedural steps were taken thereafter. The main step was the resolution of an agreed preliminary question as to the scope of the Authority’s jurisdiction.12 [28] Earlier this year, an amend...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 217 Dixon v Invercargill City Council [pdf, 702 KB]

   ...the First Schedule of the Act in relation to the Proposed Invercargill District Plan BETWEEN THOMAS ANDREW DIXON, DOUGLAS STANLEY MUNRO AND R MUNRO, JOHN DAVID SCOTT AND OAKLAND FAMILY TRUST (ENV-2016-CHC-097) GREGORY SIMMONS (ENV-2016-CHC-101) Appellants AND INVERCARGILL CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J R Jackson Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Hearing: at Invercargill on 6 August 2018 Appearances: R Chapman for the appellants M Morris fo...

7. [2019] NZEnvC 142 Darby Planning Limited Partnership v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...Strategic Policy 3.3.3 included. Interim Decision [2019] NZEnvC 133 is otherwise unchanged. J J M Hassan Environment Judge ENV-2018-CHC-056 ENV-2018-CHC-082 ENV-2018-CHC-084 ENV-2018-CHC-092 ENV-2018-CHC-093 ENV-2018-CHC-098 ENV-2018-CHC-101 ENV-2018-CHC-106 ENV-2018-CHC-119 ENV-2018-CHC-124 ENV-2018-CHC-126 ENV-2018-CHC-127 ENV-2018-CHC-131 ENV-2018-CHC-134 ENV-2018-CHC-137 ENV-2018-CHC-138 ENV-2018-CHC-146 4 SCHEDULE List of Appellants Upper Clutha Environme...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 64 Fox v Hereworth School Trust Board No 5 Interlocutory [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...defendant 2 Burtton v Talley’s Group Ltd [2010] NZEmpC 118 at [3]. 3 Cruickshank v Chief Executive of Unitec Institute of Technology [2012] NZEmpC 33 at [7]. 4 Saunders v Campbell (1987) 2 PRNZ 101 (HC). reached a preliminary view that the plaintiff was guilty of serious misconduct and that the appropriate sanction for this would be her dismissal. That decision was not, however, taken until the defendant met again on 12...

9. Coronial-Booklet-Simplified-Chinese.pdf [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...杂或死因不明时更是如此。您和您的家人以及亲朋可能会在彼此间以及你们的 社区中找到支持。但是，如果您觉得需要更多支持，以下一些组织可以通过多 种方式为您提供帮助： ACC 如果家人或家庭成员死于事故，可提供经济支持。免费电话：0800 101 996。 网站：acc.co.nz/im-injured/financial-support/financial-support-after-death After a Suicide 心理健康基金会为受自杀影响的家庭和亲朋提�...

10. [2023] NZEmpC 35 New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc v Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand [pdf, 249 KB]

    ...at [17], and Chamberlains v Lai [2005] NZSC 32 at [5]. 15 New Zealand Fire Service Commission v Ivamy [1996] 1 ERNZ 591 (CA) at 592. 16 Ovation New Zealand Ltd v The New Zealand Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Incorporated [2018] NZEmpC 101. 17 At [23]. [36] In light of the content of the pleadings which the parties have filed, it is apparent there will be legal issues as to the proper interpretation of the agreements referred to earlier, but the Court will also b...