Search Results

1. Te Whatu Ora – New Zealand Health v CultureSafe NZ Ltd (in liquidation) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...BECK [1] In a determination dated 25 February 2019, the Employment Relations Authority removed to the Court an application which had been filed by the plaintiff.1 1 Bay of Plenty District Health Board v CultureSafe New Zealand Ltd [2019] NZERA 101. [2] The plaintiff and second defendant have reached a full and final settlement of all matters between them in relation to these proceedings. [3] A joint memorandum of those parties seeks that the agreement be recorded by...

2. [2014] NZEmpC 104 Gapuzan v Pratt & Whitney Air NZ Services t/a Christchurch Engine Centre [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...advanced is correct. b) In the event that the remedies sought under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 1 (the Act) are determined by the Official Assignee or this Court are personal to the plaintiff and do not vest under s 101 of the Insolvency Act 2006, then the defendant seeks an order that such claim is frivolous and vexatious and should be dismissed. c) Costs in relation to its application. [3] The grounds of the application are: a) The plaintiff...

3. TG v Tangilanu [2012] NZIACDT 28 (15 June 2012) [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...manner that identifies the Complainant. [9] This order has no impact on publication of Ms Tangilanu’s identity. The Tribunal has already determined there are no grounds for restricting publication in relation to her. [10] The Tribunal orders: [10.1] The name and identity of the complainant in this matter is not to be disclosed or published. [10.2] The decisions of this Tribunal, may be published, after deletion of the name, and any information that will identify the complainant,...

4. ED v G Council [2023] NZDT 558 (24 November 2023) [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...Act does not say there needs to be physical damage to physical or tangible property arising from a tort, just loss of property, which I have encountered, ie I have lost money. 5. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the claim in tort (section 10(1)(c) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 (DTA)) in respect of: “(i) the destruction or loss of any property: (ii) any damage or injury to any property: (iii) the recovery of any property.” 6. ED says monetary loss is property lo...

5. NZCVS - Property Crime [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...APPROXIMATELY 32 PROPERTY CRIME INCIDENTS PER 100 HOUSEHOLDS. PROPORTION OF HOUSEHOLDS THAT EXPERIENCED THEFT AND DAMAGE, BY PERCEPTION OF SAFETY NUMBER AND PROPORTION (ROUNDED) OF HOUSEHOLDS THAT EXPERIENCED PROPERTY CRIME WITHIN THE LAST 12 MONTHS 73,049 101,325 215,047 PROPORTION OF HOUSEHOLDS THAT EXPERIENCED INCIDENTS OF BURGLARIES, BY RESIDENCY OWNERSHIP RENTED, PRIVATE RENTED, GOVERNEMENT (LOCAL/CENTRAL) OWNED (INCLUDING A MORTGAGE) PROPORTION OF HOUSEHOLDS THAT EXPERIEN...

6. Taipari v Hauraki Māori Trust Board (2010) 1 Waikato Maniapoto MB 59 (1 WMN 59) [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...final order of costs that is just and reasonable in all the circumstances. [4] Taking into account my determination that the award of costs reasonably and properly incurred should be 45% I now fix costs inclusive of GST and disbursements at $101,275.00 and allow 45%, being $45,574.00. [5] Pursuant to section 79 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 there is an order that the Board pay the sum of $45,574.00 by way of costs to the applicants. Pronounced in open Court at Hamilton...

7. Form CS7: Notice of appeal against Commissioner's decision to refuse to accept an application formula assessment [pdf, 111 KB]

   r 259 Form CS 7 Notice of appeal against Commissioner's decision to refuse to accept application for formula assessment of child support Section 101, Child Support Act 1991 at ……………………………… [place] ……………………………………………………………………………………….. [full name] ……………………………………………………………………………………….. [addre...

8. [2012] NZEmpC 66 Hepburn v Huhtamaki Henderson Ltd [pdf, 43 KB]

   ...Authority) dated 17 April 2012. There was no copy of the determination attached to the application and the Court has no way of knowing whether an application for a similar publication prohibition had been made directly to the Authority pursuant to cl 10(1) of sch 2 to the Act. [2] The power of the Court under cl 12(1) is restricted to proceedings that are currently before it. There are no proceedings presently before the Court relating to the Authority’s determination dated 17...

9. Children and young people in court infographic June 2020 [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...Youth, District and High Courts in the year ended June 2020 Most offending by children and young people is dealt with outside the court system, only the most serious offending goes to court 1,518 had charges  finalised in court in 2019/2020 768 1,101 had charges proved Children and young people were in court in 2019/2020, 417 had charges not proved 333  received orders or sentences while the remaining of these proved charges followed plans agreed at Family Group Conferences and...

10. ABG v ZYW [2011] NZDT 88 (5 September 2011) [pdf, 72 KB]

    ...THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Applicant’s claim is struck out as it does not fall within the jurisdiction of the Disputes Tribunal. Law [1] The Disputes Tribunal’s jurisdiction is set out in s 10(1) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988, comprising broadly of claims in contract, quasi-contract and property torts. Facts [2] The Respondent, ZYW, gave the Applicant, ABG, and a third party her opinion in relation to a rule of th...