Search Results

1. VM v ND & HB LCRO 249/2012 (30 November 2015) [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...Committee’s view it would be going too far to criticise Ms HB for not having ensured that Mr ND did so, or that he did so in appropriate terms. She was entitled to assume that Mr ND would attend to those responsibilities and obligations appropriately. 101. Accordingly the Committee makes a determination to take no further action in respect of the complaint against Ms HB, pursuant to s 152(2)(c) of the Act. 1 Standards Committee deter...

2. [2021] NZEnvC 182 Country Lifestyles Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...Epsom Residential Protection Society Incorporated v Auckland Council [2021] NZEnvC 68. 2 Above n 1. 3 Mawhinney (as Trustee) and the Trustees of the Waitakere Forest land Trust and the Trustees of Forest Trust v Auckland Council [2017] NZEnvC 162 at [101] to [105]. 4 appropriate for the Court to consider afresh the Council’s decision to return CLL’s application under ss 88(3) and 88(3A) of the RMA as incomplete (on the basis of the information that was before the Council’s...

3. AC v FV & HU LCRO 318/2012 (27 November 2014) [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...employee of Mr FV. [20] The Law Practitioners Act did not regulate the conduct of employees. The only remedies in the Act in respect of an employee’s conduct was to direct that they should not be employed by a lawyer (s 114(2)). [21] Section 101 of the Law Practitioners Act provides that where a complaint is against an employee of a lawyer a charge could have been brought against her before the New Zealand Disciplinary Tribunal if the District Council considered the charge to...

4. 20220421-Section-7-Report-Rotorua-District-Council.pdf [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...basis of those figures, I consider that the Bill creates a disadvantage for non-Māori because the proposed representation arrangements in cl 10 would lead to disparity in representation between the Māori ward and the general ward. 16. Clause 10(1) of the Bill establishes a representation arrangement for Council members to be elected as follows: 16.1 3 members by the electors of the Te Ipu Wai Taketake ward (Māori seats) 16.2 3 members by the electors of the Te Ipu Wai Auraki war...

5. [2023] NZIACDT 21 – WN v Lawlor (26 June 2023) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...(1) In breach of cl 1, Mr Lawlor failed to be honest, professional and conduct himself in a timely manner to – (a) Ensure that the original documents were returned to the complainant upon his multiple requests 7 Z, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 7 (b) Refund to the complainant the fee for the unfiled partnership visa [31] The complainant terminated Mr Lawlor’s instructions to proceed on 13 April 2022. At the same time, he requested his original documents...

6. HL & NL v FL [2022] NZDT 280 (7 November 2022) [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...of partnership property (whether physical property or money). In round barn 100. The same considerations apply to the spare wheels for top dresser and wheel for grader blade that NL is claiming under this heading. The counterclaim 101. The counterclaim seeks compensation totalling $21,200.00 in respect of 7 items of property. QX’s trailer and Green calf trailer 102. The claim seeks compensation for these items, which are in NL’s possession. CI0301_CIV_D...

7. Children and young people data notes and trends June 2020 [pdf, 307 KB]

   ...are European, while decreasing over the last 10 years, has increased over the last year (from 24% to 26% and from 357 to 393 people). Most children and young people had their charges proved In 2019/2020, most children and young people (1,101; 73%) had their most serious charge proved.5 As a result, they were either discharged under section 282 (768; 51% of children and young people charged), received a Youth Court order under section 283 (19% of children and young people c...

8. LCRO 205/2017 QB v PC [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...elements to s 198. First, the section ensures that applicants have adequate time to file an application for review. Secondly, the section 1 Lawyers and Conveyancers Amendment Bill 2010 (120-1), cl 10.1. 4 imposes obligation on an applicant to file their application promptly. This is intended to ensure that the statutory objective of having complaints dealt with expeditiously is achieved. [19] The provisions of s 198 of the Act are...

9. Mr-Rasheeds-Submissions-of-37-Families.pdf [pdf, 619 KB]

   ...effectively “establish” the matters that s 57 of the Coroner’s Act requires be established. Such matters will include not just the “cause” of death but the “circumstances” surrounding it. If an issue 2 Legislation Act 2019, s 10(1) 3 Wallace v Attorney General [2021] NZCA 506 at [275]. 4 These being a matter for inquiry under s 57(2) of the Coroners Act. 5 Osman v United Kingdom [1998] ECHR 101, cited by the Chief Coroner in the Minute at [60]. 6 See R v Fitzgera...

10. Mitchell v Corrections [2024] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...[9] Corrections otherwise denies that it failed to substantively respond to Ms Mitchell’s requests in accordance with the requirements of the Act. 4 ISSUES [10] To determine the claim, the Tribunal must consider the following issues: [10.1] Did Corrections respond to Ms Mitchell’s information privacy requests within the timeframes required under s 40(1) of the Act? [10.2] Was the information provided to Ms Mitchell without undue delay, including a document provided at...