4502 items matching your search terms
...the Committee’s function to resolve employment related disputes. In the circumstances the Employment Relations 1 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rr 10,10.1,10.3,10.3.1,10.7,11.1and 2.3. 2 Rules 10 and 10.1. 3 Rules 10.3,10.3.1 and 10.7. 3 Authority or civil courts provided Ms BB with an adequate alternate remedy that it would be reasonable for her to exercise. In the circumstances...
...sets out the actions that remain to be taken by the Consent Holder; (c) provides an estimated time frame for completion of the actions that remain to be taken; and (d) reports on the results of sampling and monitoring data required by conditions 10.1a and 10.1B. 3.5 The Consent Holder shall not apply for a change of the conditions of this consent, or for a new consent, to authorise discharges from the East Bank Discharge Point after 1 May 2027. (Refer to Advice Note 7) Map Refere...
...There is no reference to the hirer’s liability to third parties, I assume because the drafter presumed that to be a matter between the hirer and any such third party. [5] This basic position as to liability is then supplemented by clauses 10.1 and 10.5 regarding ADM Ltd’s damage waiver and excess policy respectively: 10.1. If the Hirer has paid the Damage Waiver the Owner will waive the Hirer’s liability (in terms of clause 7) for accidental damage ... 10.5. Excess: Al...
...was Jirst heard on 22 March 200 I (28 AT 2(,O· 2M) when Nllla Dangen, solicitor, appcarcd lill' the Applicllltt Trustees, ilrian lIoyer, solicitor, appcared in support on bchalf of the Ministry of Education, Lellh Watson, solicitor, appenrcd 101' the Kohanga Reo in opposition to the npplieation, Following lengthy discussioll, the Court ndjllurned the hcal'ing with spccifie directions as to the issnes renHlining to be addressed, The nl,plication retul'ltc'd tll...
SUMMARY Case: Hearn & Ors v Parklane Investments Ltd & Ors – FINAL DETERMINATION File No: TRI 2008-101-000045/ DBH 05356 Court: WHT Adjudicator: R Pitchforth Date of Decision: 21 September 2009 Background In an Interim Determination dated 30 April 2009, the Tribunal held that the Wellington City Council, Mr Debney and Wadestown Developments Ltd (Wadestown) were jointly and severally liable to the claimants for the sum of $449,807. Those parties were invited to...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-101-000025 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 38 BETWEEN GREGORY MCDONALD Claimant AND TIMOTHY PETERS First Respondent AND BUILDING APPROVALS AND SOLUTIONS LIMITED Second Respondent AND MIKE HISLOP Third Respondent AND NEIL BROWN Fourth Respondent AND CARLTON RICHARDS Fifth Respondent AND NELSON CITY COUNCIL (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND GRAHAM SCOTT Seventh Respondent AND PHILIP HILLEARD Eighth Respondent...
SUMMARY Case: Dixon & Anor v Dixon & Ors – PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 2 File No: TRI 2009-101-000026/ DBH 05690 Court: WHT Adjudicator: R Pitchforth Date of Decision: 4 August 2009 Background This Procedural Order deals with the applications for joinder and removal of certain parties. In particular, the Tribunal deals with the joinder of a director of a building certifying company which has been struck off. Applications for Removal First Respondents – Trustee...
SUMMARY Case: Body Corporate 81738 v Wellington City Council (Kelburn Parade) File No: TRI 2008-101-000079 to 92/ DBH 01733 to 1745 Citation: [2010] NZWHT Wellington 15 Court: WHT Adjudicator: C Ruthe Date of Decision: 4 June 2010 Background This claim relates to two separate apartment blocks which was originally filed under the 2002 Act but later abandoned and filed under the 2006 Act. Prior to the hearing, the claimants reached a substantial partial settlement with th...
r 406 Form PPPR 23 Application by attorney for directions Section 101, Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 In the Family Court FAM No: ……………… at ……………………………… [place] ……………………………………………………………………………………….. [full name] ……………………………………………...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-101-0064 BETWEEN ANDERSON FAMILY TRUST Claimants AND KELLY and BARRY DOYLE First Respondent AND MAX KEEN Second Respondent AND PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND NOVACOCA LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND NOVACRETE LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND SHELDON PEPE Sixth Respondent AND GIANCARLO PEPE Seventh Respondent DETERMINATION Dated 16 December 2009 I. INTRODUCTI...