Canterbury Westland Standards Committee 1 v Williams [2019] NZLCDT 33 [pdf, 317 KB]
...Mrs Z’s and or Mr and Mrs Z’s instructions is not consistent with the evidence that she was passive in the dealings nor that Mr Williams saw 19 Paragraph [5.8]. 20 Notes of Evidence p 101. 21 Notes of Evidence pp 71 and 72. 22 Paragraph [16] submissions in response. 15 his role solely as a “decision making trustee” not solicitor acting on instructions. (l) The clear distinction in roles that existed in th...