Ministry of Justice

Search Results

1. Wright v CAC 10056 & Woods [2011] NZREADT 21 [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...boundary details. [5] Ms Wright said that she showed the Woods (the complainants) around the property on Sunday 11th April. They saw the property twice on this day. She affirmed that the aerial photograph (bundle of documents appellant page 101) was available at the viewing. [6] She said that she told the Woods that she did not know where the boundary was but that the car pad and driveway were on council land. She asserted that she told the Woods that not all of the grass on...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 272 Auckland Council v Eco Earth NZ Limited [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...complete the remediation works according to the timeframe specified in the RAP. Site validation 9. Within one month of the completion of remediation works, provide a Site Validation Report (SVR) to Auckland Council. 10. The SVR shall: 10.1 Set out the remediation works completed, 10.2 Confirm that the remediation works were completed in accordance with the RAP, 10.3 Be certified by a suitably qualified and experienced CPEng Geotechnical Engineer, and 5 10....

3. People with finalised charges and convicted of family violence offences jun2024 [xlsx, 143 KB]

   ...violence 25,338 28,856 29,332 28,643 28,605 30,171 31,637 25,723 29,059 31,209 12% 13% 13% 13% 13% 15% 15% 15% 15% 14% Other offences 192,831 191,331 196,594 193,117 184,272 174,407 180,464 142,481 163,228 185,675 88% 87% 87% 87% 87% 85% 85% 85% 85% 86% Total 218,169 220,187 225,926 221,760 212,877 204,578 212,101 168,204 192,287 216,884 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1b.FV charges by offence Table 1b: Number and percentage of finalised charges for family violence offen...

4. All finalised charges and convicted charges jun2024 [xlsx, 276 KB]

   ...1981/1982 1982/1983 1983/1984 1984/1985 1985/1986 1986/1987 1987/1988 1988/1989 1989/1990 1990/1991 1991/1992 1992/1993 1993/1994 1994/1995 1995/1996 1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999 1999/2000 2000/2001 2001/2002 2002/2003 2003/2004 2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 2023/2024 294410 252120 254658 274022 272657 298086 292500 308817 270585 241026...

5. CN & MN v KN & W Ltd [2024] NZDT 521 (7 August 2024) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...where one person has been unjustly enriched at the expense of another, and restitution is appropriate because it would be unjust for one party to retain a benefit at the other’s expense), or in tort in respect of loss of, or damage to, property (s10(1) of the DT Act). The Tribunal also has jurisdiction conferred on it by the statutes set out in Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the DT Act (s10(2) of the DT Act), including the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (“the CGA”) and the Fair Trading Act...

6. M Dwan v Park No 3 Trust & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 11 [pdf, 249 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-101-000040 [2013] NZWHT AUCKLAND 11 BETWEEN MARGARET DIANNE DWAN (9 Olympic Lane) Claimant AND PARK NO 3 TRUST C/- PHILIP JOHN DUNCAN (Removed) First Respondent AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL (Subrogated) Second Respondent AND ASPECT CONTRACTORS LTD (Removed) AND MARK VAN DEN DORPE Third Respondent AND WENBORN PLUMBING (DAVID ANDREW WENBORN) (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND RITE-VIE...

7. Mark McNeilly (dated 21 April 2017) [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   ...BLOCH WAIJ<OUAITI SURVEY DISTRICT LM-309448-3-704-V1 APPENDIX 5 MM-022 MM-023 mcneillym Typewritten Text Bend 5 LM-309448-3-704-V1 APPENDIX 6 MM-024 2420/D3/101 REV B SCALE FOR REDUCED PRINTS - 10 mm DIVISIONS2420/D3/101-B TITLE DRAWING No. REFERENCE DRAWINGS NOTES GEOMETRIC OVERVIEW BENDS 4/5 L & A Talbot Services Ltd P.O. BOX 33 MANGAWHAI 0583 NORTHLAND NEW ZEALAND Phone: (09) 431...

8. LCRO 341/2013 QE v ML (nee BM) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...Committee does not consider that it has jurisdiction to consider this issue of complaint. Failing to reply to correspondence:13 75. In the Committee’s view, Mr QE’s failure to respond to correspondence from Mr QA was in breach of both Rule 10 and 10.1 of the Rules of Conduct and Client Care. Accordingly, the Committee determines that in respect of Mr QE’s failure to respond to correspondence after 1 August 2008, that there has been unsatisfactory conduct on his part as defined...

9. Legal aid payments to firms - 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 [pdf, 569 KB]

   ...BARRISTER AUCKLAND $45,423.90 B S YEOMAN LIMITED LOWER HUTT $262,528.83 B V WILSON Auckland $3,762.00 BADEN MEYER - BARRISTER Auckland $121,772.52 BAMFORD LAW NELSON $346,198.87 BANNERMANS GORE $10,135.93 BANNISTER & VON DADELSZEN HASTINGS $101,065.80 BARBARA BUCKETT & ASSOCIATES WELLINGTON $0.00 BARBARA COLLIS - BARRISTER OPOTIKI $26,032.28 BARBARA HUNT - BARRISTER WELLINGTON $96,644.10 BARBARA KNOWLES AUCKLAND $196.70 BARBARA READ - BARRISTER CHRISTCHURCH $0.00 BARBARA VAG...

10. LCRO 20/2016 LC and CM v JP (19 March 2019) [pdf, 238 KB]

    ...preferred over Mr JP’s. Mr LC refutes Mr MJ’s evidence and maintains his offence at Mr JP’s form of address. [18] The Committee considered Mr JP’s conduct in the context of s 110 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act) and rr 10, 10.1 and 3.1 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules), noting the conflict between Mr JP’s evidence and that of the applicants. Focussing on the fact that the applicants had chosen...