AAH v ZZT [2012] NZDT 39 (15 October 2012) [pdf, 51 KB]
...contends that the actions of the Respondent and his employer, have harmed his economic interests by preventing the sale of his product to a vineyard. It is suggested that the Tribunal may have jurisdiction to deal with the application pursuant to s 10(1)(c)(ii) of the empowering Act. This provides for the Tribunal to have jurisdiction in respect of “a claim in tort in respect of any damage or injury to any property”. Findings [3] I am unable to uphold the Applicant’s ar...