The Convention against Torture & Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment(external link) (CAT) was adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 39/46 of 10 December 1984 and entered into force on 26 June 1987. New Zealand ratified the CAT on 10 December 1989.
New Zealand has made the following reservation to the CAT:
The Government of New Zealand reserves the right to award compensation to torture victims referred to in article 14 of the Convention Against Torture only at the discretion of the Attorney-General of New Zealand.
Upon ratification, the Government of New Zealand also made the following declaration under articles 21 and 22 of the CAT:
1. In accordance with article 21, paragraph 1, of the Convention, [the Government of New Zealand declares] that it recognises the competence of the Committee Against Torture to receive and consider communications to the effect that a State Party claims that another State Party is not fulfilling its obligations under the Convention; and
2. In accordance with article 22, paragraph 1, of the Convention, [the Government of New Zealand] recognises the competence of the Committee Against Torture to receive and consider communications from or on behalf of individuals subject to its jurisdiction who claim to be victims of a violation by a State Party of the provisions of the Convention.
The Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment was adopted on 18 December 2002 at the fifty-seventh session of the General Assembly of the United Nations by resolution A/RES/57/199 and entered into force on 22 June 2006. New Zealand ratified the Optional Protocol on 14 March 2007.
The Ministry of Justice is responsible for administering the CAT and its Protocol.
The CAT provides for:
The Optional Protocol to the CAT provides for:
Adopted on 12 May 2022, the United Nations Committee Against Torture made a decision concerning communication No. 934/2019 under article 22 of the Convention. The committee can consider communications from those claiming to be victims of a violation. In this case Mr Richards, the complainant, made a communication on 13 March 2018 claiming a violation of his rights under articles 2, 10, 11, 12 and 13 and 14. The committee found articles 12, 13 and 14 of the Convention had been breached. The committee asked New Zealand to publish and disseminate the decision widely.
A copy of the decision can be found here. [PDF, 372 KB]
Find out more
Reporting procedure for the core human rights instruments of the United Nations
New Zealand's common core document: 'Human Rights Review 2010' [PDF, 4.7 MB]
Committee Against Torture(external link)
This page was last updated: