Substantive decision. Complaint upheld.
Some decisions are published here by the judiciary from courts and tribunals. Not all decisions are published, and not all decisions can be found through our finder.
Find out more about using the decision finder.
View the full list of where to find decisions for each court or tribunal.
Decisions for the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court can be found in the Judicial Decisions Online.
There are also tools to help you find publications or forms, as explained on the Document finders page.
743 items matching your search terms
Substantive decision. Complaint upheld.
New Zealand Cards Ltd v Ramsay
Maritime Union of NZ Inc v Ports of Auckland
Premier Events Group Ltd and Ors v Beattie and Ors
Decision date: 22 March 2012. Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994.
Decision date: 22 March 2012. Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994.
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
Han v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 19 TRI 2011-100-000054/DBH 5936. Decision date 21 March 2012.
Paterson v Whangarei District Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 18 TRI 2011-100-000003/DBH 5826. Decision date 21 March 2012.
AC v Secretary for Justice 20 March 2012 NZRA 000003
Jurisdiction / Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 / Resource Management Act 1991 / Applicant claimed costs against the respondent for the moving of a water supply valve to comply with a resource consent condition / Applicant claims Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the claim under the Fair Trading Act 1986 / Held: the parties’ relationship was created by the Respondent’s statutory authority under the Resource Management Act / Applicant’s claim is outside Tribunal’s jurisdiction / claim is to be struck out.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
No jurisdiction to file review outside of 30 day working period.
19.03.2012 | Judge Clark | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 | Trespass, Ad medium filum, Midpoint of river, Fullest flow definition, Bank to bank test
Miller v Fonterra Co-Operative Group
Huang v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 16 decision on liability and quantum of Auckland Council TRI 2011-100-000057/DBH 6499. Decision date 16 March 2012. See also the Huang v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 26 decision on claim by Auckland Council against Mr Lamb, and the High Court Auckland Council v Lamb [2012] NZHC appeal decision 2932 CIV-2012-404-003516.
Manchester Securities Limited [2012] NZWHT Auckland 17 eligibility decision DBH 6813. Decision date 16 March 2012
Penalty decision.
Penalty decision.
Substantive decision. Complaint dismissed.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Wentzel v Collie [2012] NZWHT Auckland 15 final determination TRI 2010-100-000121/DBH 6269. Decision date 14 March 2012. See also the High Court Wentzel v Collie [2013] NZHC 63 appeal decision CIV-2012-404-1447.
Carter Holt Harvey Limited v McAuley
Pursuant to section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the determination of the Standards Committee to take no further action is confirmed but modified as provided in this decision