Some decisions are published here by the judiciary from courts and tribunals. Not all decisions are published, and not all decisions can be found through our finder.

Find out more about using the decision finder. 

View the full list of where to find decisions for each court or tribunal.

Decisions for the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court can be found in the Judicial Decisions Online.

There are also tools to help you find publications or forms, as explained on the Document finders page.

Search results

743 items matching your search terms

  3. [2012] NZCA 481 CA327/2011 Postal Workers Union of Aoteaoroa Inc v Street and NZ Post Ltd [PDF, 141 KB]

    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT, 30 October 2012. CA judgment setting aside the decisions of the Employment Court and Employment Relations Authority in this matter. The Court of Appeal was satisfied that the Employment Court was in error in concluding there was an onus on the employee to establish the pay her or she would otherwise received on the day in question. Rather, the onus fell on the employer to meet the statutory obligation to pay the minimum entitlement on the day in question. The Court concluded that interpreted in accordance with the purpose of the Act, s 9 required the employer first to establish or attempt to establish the amount of unrostered overtime that would otherwise have been received by the employee under s 9(1)(b)(ii). If that were not possible, then the employer was obliged to apply the averaging formula under s 9(3). The respondent is ordered to pay one set of costs to the appellants as for a standard appeal on a band A basis with usual disbursements.
  13. AEG v ZVP Ltd [2012] NZDT 339 (23 October 2012) [PDF, 101 KB]

    Contract / Bailment / Applicant left his trailer with the Respondent for a warrant of fitness / trailer left by the Respondent outside overnight and not in an area monitored by security camera / trailer stolen / held that a relationship of bailment existed / held that Respondent had been negligent in its care of the trailer while it was in its possession and failed to take reasonable care / Respondent liable for the full cost of the trailer.