Application for approval as a provider of criminal legal aid services. Held: decision refusing the Applicant’s application for approval to provide services in approval level 3 criminal proceedings confirmed.
If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, Review Authority substantial).
40 items matching your search terms
Application for approval as a provider of criminal legal aid services. Held: decision refusing the Applicant’s application for approval to provide services in approval level 3 criminal proceedings confirmed.
Minute regarding application for approval as a provider of criminal legal aid PAL 4. Held: Secretary's concession on clause 5(b) does not put the Applicant at a disadvantage in any material respect.
Application for approval as a provider of Appellate legal aid services. Held: applicant did not have enough recent experience to provide services at appellate courts.
Application for approval as a provider of criminal legal aid services. An experienced criminal legal aid provider at PAL 3 level, who is considered ready to step up to PAL 4. Held: decision refusing the Applicant’s application for approval to provide services in approval level 4 criminal proceedings reversed.
Application for review of decision declining Applicant approval to provide services in approved PAL 4 proceedings. Held: appropriate for Secretary to ask for additional reference specifically discussing Applicant’s suitability for criminal PAL 4 approval, decision confirmed.
Application for review of decision declining Applicant approval as a lead provider of criminal legal aid PAL 3. Held: Applicant has shown he meets the knowledge/skill requirements and is sufficiently experienced and competent, decision reversed.
Application for review of the Secretary’s decision to impose a supervision condition. References from professional colleagues have allayed any previous concerns. Held: decision to impose supervision condition reversed.
Application for review of decision declining approval as a lead provider for Criminal Legal Aid PAL 3. Held: too high a threshold set for applicant to meet before gaining approval. Decision to decline reversed.
Application for review of decision declining approval as a lead Provider for Criminal PAL 3 and Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. Held: insufficient documentation provided to establish the applicant has the experience and competence to deal with the more complex matters that can arise in PAL3 proceedings. Application for review declined.
AB v Secretary of Justice [2019] NZRA 001 (2 September 2019)
AE v Secretary of Justice 21 November 2017 NZRA 004/2017 (Amended)
AE v Secretary of Justice 18 October 2017 NZRA 004/2017
AD v Secretary of Justice 10 October 2017 NZRA 003/2017
AC v Secretary of Justice 4 May 2017 NZRA 002/2017
AB v Secretary of Justice 27 March 2017 NZRA 001/2017
D v Secretary for Justice 25 September 2016 NZRA 001/2016
AH v Secretary for Justice 20 February 2015 [2014] NZRA 000008
AE v Secretary for Justice 9 December 2014 NZRA 000007
AG v Secretary for Justice 30 September 2014 NZRA 000004
AC v Secretary for Justice 22 August 2014 [2014] NZRA 000003
AB v Secretary for Justice 26 June 2014 [2014] NZRA 000001
AS v Secretary of Justice 3 September 2013 NZRA 00005
AR v Secretary of Justice 15 July 2013 NZRA 000004
AQ v Secretary of Justice 5 March 2013 NZRA 000001
AP v Secretary of Justice 5 March 2013 NZRA 000025