Search Results

1. A v Van Wijk (Application for Non-Publication Orders) [2017] NZHRRT 25. Note non-publication restrictions. [pdf, 145 KB]

   1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS AND IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE PLAINTIFF, HER HUSBAND AND CHILDREN (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 25 Reference No. HRRT 067/2016 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN [Redacted] PLAINTIFF AND MICHAEL VAN WIJK FIRST DEFENDANT AND THE BISHOP OF NELSON SECOND...

2. Kapiarumala v New Zealand Catholic Bishops Conference (Strike-Out Application) [2018 NZHRRT 18 [pdf, 206 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 18 Reference No. HRRT 040/2017 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN ALEX KAPIARUMALA PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND CATHOLIC BISHOPS CONFERENCE FIRST DEFENDANT AND MICHAEL GIELEN SECOND DEFENDANT AND SEXUAL ABUSE PROTOCOL COMMITTEE THIRD DEFENDANT AND BISHOP STEPHEN LOWE FOURTH DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms K Anderson, Memb...

3. Hines v Attorney-General (Application to Remove Proceedings to High Court) [2018] NZHRRT 26 [pdf, 256 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 26 Reference No. HRRT 071/2016 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN DAVID HINES FIRST PLAINTIFF TANYA JACOB SECOND PLAINTIFF AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF NEW ZEALAND DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr G Little and Ms G Whiteford for plaintiffs Mr P Rishworth...

4. Popa v Canterbury University (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 255 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 1 Reference No. HRRT 034/2016 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN GABRIELLA POPA PLAINTIFF AND CANTERBURY UNIVERSITY DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms MA Roche, Co-Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member REPRESENTATION: Dr Popa in person Ms P Shaw for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 25 Januar...

5. Benjamin v Southern District Health Board (Strike-Out Application) [2020] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...and disclosed in a way that was an interference with her privacy. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Benjamin v Southern District Health Board (Strike-Out application) [2020] NZHRRT 21.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 21 2 [2] Ms Benjamin complained to the Privacy Commissioner, but the Privacy Commissioner decided, after correspondence with Ms Benjamin’s lawyer, that he would not investigate the complai...

6. Meulenbroek v Vision Antenna Systems Ltd (Costs) [2015] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 52 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 3 Reference No. HRRT 020/2013 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN MARK CHRISTOPHER MEULENBROEK PLAINTIFF AND VISION ANTENNA SYSTEMS LIMITED DEFENDANT AT INVERCARGILL BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr RW Kee and Ms JV Emerson for plaintiff Ms RK Brazil and Ms H Young for defendant DATE OF HEAR...

7. Baker v High Court (Costs) [2022] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 696 KB]

   (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF PLAINTIFF’S NAME (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON Reference No. HRRT 045/2021 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN SUSAN BAKER Plaintiff AND HIGH COURT OF AUCKLAND First Defendant AND NEW ZEALAND COURT OF APPEAL Second Defendant AND COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE Third Defendant AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL Fourth Defendant AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG...

8. BORA Employment Standards Legislation Bill [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...under the Act. Increasing compliance with employment standards appears to be a legitimate and appropriate purpose. http://ndhadeliver.natlib.govt.nz/ArcAggregator/arcView/resource/IE26146201/http:/www.justice.govt.nz/policy/constitutional-law-and-human-rights/human-rights/bill-of-rights/employment-standards-legislation-bill#-1-rjr-macdonald • Expectations of privacy may not be as great in the commercial world as they are in the domestic sphere. [2] Effective regulation of employment sta...

9. Brown v Otago Polytechnic (Strike-Out Application) [2014] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 96 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 22 Reference No. HRRT 003/2013 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN MATTHEW RICHARD BROWN PLAINTIFF AND OTAGO POLYTECHNIC DEFENDANT AT DUNEDIN BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr RK Musuku, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr MR Brown in person supported by Mr VE Scott as McKenzie friend Mr BCS Dorking for Otago Polytechnic DATE OF HEARI...

10. 20230725-McLean-Institute-Trust-Variation-Bill-final-for-publication [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...Acts of 1909, 1930 and 1934. Consistency of the Bill with the Bill of Rights Act Section 19 – Freedom from discrimination 5. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds set out in the Human Rights Act 1993 (Human Rights Act). It is generally unlawful to treat people in comparable circumstances differently on the basis of a prohibited ground, unless the difference is justified. 6. Discrimination under section 19 of the...