Decision on interim suspension. Date of decision: 26 April 2024.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Helpful search tips:
506 items matching your search terms
Decision on interim suspension. Date of decision: 26 April 2024.
Decision on liability. Date of decision: 9 April 2024.
Decision on liability. Date of decision: 27 March 2024.
Decision on penalty. Date of decision: 14 March 2024.
Decision on liability. Date of decision: 9 February 2024.
Decision on liability and penalty. Date of decision: 9 February 2024.
Decision on penalty. Date of decision: 9 February 2024. Date of reissued decision: 21 February 2024.
Decision on penalty. Date of decision: 5 December 2023.
Decision on liability. Date of decision: 20 November 2023.
Decision on penalty. Date of decision: 7 November 2023.
Decision on penalty. Date of decision: 31 October 2023.
Decision on liability and penalty. Date of decision: 31 October 2023.
Decision on penalty. Date of decision: 13 October 2023.
Decision on liability and penalty. Date of decision: 13 October 2023.
Decision on penalty. Date of decision: 10 October 2023.
Decision on penalty. Date of decision: 10 October 2023.
Decision on costs. Date of decision: 21 September 2023.
Decision on costs. Date of decision: 1 September 2023.
Decision on manner of compliance with witness summonses. Date of decision: 23 August 2023.
Decision on penalty. Date of decision: 18 August 2023.
Decision on penalty. Date of decision: 17 August 2023.
Decision on application to practice on own account. Date of decision: 16 August 2023.
Decision on application to strike out proceeding. Date of decision: 4 August 2023.
Decision on penalty. Date of decision: 27 July 2023.
Name suppression / Tribunal initially declined name suppression as practitioner’s interests did not tip balance from starting point of open justice / practitioner sought judicial review / High Court required Tribunal to reconsider name suppression having regard to interests of complainants, an unrelated practitioner that shares practitioner’s uncommon name and other similarities, and practitioner’s family members / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 240 / HELD / real likelihood that unrelated practitioner will be unfairly associated with practitioner’s misconduct / one of two complainants supports name suppression / effect of publication on practitioner’s family members considered / unusual combination of factors tipped balance in favour of suppression / name suppression proper to avoid confusion with unrelated practitioner and damage to his reputation and legal practice, having regard to serious misconduct of practitioner / permanent name suppression granted